Vision-Language Model
Definition
A multimodal AI model that processes both images and text together, enabling visual understanding, image-based reasoning, and text generation grounded in visual content.
Why It Matters
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) represent the convergence of computer vision and language understanding. Instead of separate systems for “what’s in this image?” and “write text about it,” VLMs do both in one model with deep integration.
This matters for practical applications: document processing, visual QA, accessibility tools, content moderation, and any task where understanding images in context is needed. VLMs are also the foundation for more advanced multimodal capabilities in flagship models like GPT-4V and Claude.
For AI engineers, VLMs unlock new product categories. Any application that deals with images can now have intelligent visual understanding without building custom CV systems.
Implementation Basics
Core Architecture
- Vision Encoder: Convert image to embeddings (CLIP, SigLIP, ViT)
- Projection Layer: Map visual embeddings to language model space
- Language Model: Process visual + text tokens together
- Output: Text generation grounded in visual content
Popular VLM Architectures
- LLaVA: Vision encoder → MLP projection → Llama/Vicuna
- BLIP-2: Vision encoder → Q-Former → LLM
- CogVLM: Deeper vision-language integration
- InternVL: Scalable vision-language design
Commercial VLMs
- GPT-4V (OpenAI)
- Claude 3 Vision (Anthropic)
- Gemini Pro Vision (Google)
- Llama 3.2 Vision (Meta)
How Visual Tokens Work
- Image split into patches (e.g., 16x16 pixels each)
- Each patch encoded to embedding
- Embeddings projected to match LLM dimension
- Visual tokens interleaved with text tokens
- LLM attention spans both modalities
Typical Capabilities
- Image description and captioning
- Visual question answering
- OCR and document understanding
- Chart/graph interpretation
- Object detection and localization (some models)
- Visual reasoning and comparison
Limitations
- Resolution tradeoffs (more patches = more cost)
- Spatial reasoning can be weak
- Small text and fine details challenging
- Hallucination about visual content
- Object counting often unreliable
Using VLMs Effectively
- Be specific about what to analyze
- Provide context about the image’s purpose
- Use high-resolution images for detail-critical tasks
- Validate outputs for high-stakes applications
- Consider multiple images for comparison tasks
Local VLM Options
- LLaVA (various sizes)
- CogVLM
- MiniGPT-4
- Qwen-VL
These enable on-premise deployment for privacy-sensitive visual understanding.
API Patterns
# Typical vision API structure
messages = [{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{"type": "image", "url": image_url},
{"type": "text", "text": "What does this diagram show?"}
]
}] Source
LLaVA demonstrates that connecting a vision encoder and an LLM for general-purpose visual and language understanding achieves impressive chat capabilities about images and visual reasoning.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.08485